Default Judgment Recommended for Destroying Evidence by Replacing Computer

Abajournal.com reports that a federal magistrate in the Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn) has recommended a default judgment as a penalty for the intentional destruction of evidence.  According to the report, the destruction was accomplished by secretly replacing the defendants' computer. The post ("Magistrate Rcommends Default Judgment for Destroyed Evidence”). is by Debra Cassens Weiss.

According to Abajournal.com , the defendants apparently tampered with their new computer’s calendar/clock to make it seem like an older computer and uploaded files (apparently other than the files sought for discovery). 

 

A default judgment is a severe penalty; in effect, the defendants will have lost the case.

 

This story serves as a reminder that records on your computer are evidence. In case of a lawsuit, the computer records become discoverable. As illustrated in this case, the penalties for intentional destruction of evidence can be severe.

 

Image: Blue gavel from Wikipedia Commons.

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.rtlitigation.com/admin/trackback/92966
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.