When Test Results Lead to Job Loss

After doctors told a Connecticut woman that genetic testing revealed that she had an "80 percent" chance of getting breast cancer, she underwent a voluntary double mastectomy. After all, according to the New York Times, both of her sisters had already contracted the disease, and test results showed her to be a carrier of the BRCA2 breast cancer gene. When she returned to work, her company started giving her fewer responsibilities, then demoted her and ultimately fired her. Previously, she had received glowing reviews.

The 39-year-old mother of two recently filed complaints claiming that her employer violated the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act.

GINA prohibits companies and health insurers from considering someone’s genetic background in firing, hiring or promotions.

The Times article states that a representative of the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission said most of the complaints filed since the genetic law took effect six months ago seemed to involve cases in which employers had improperly acquired or disclosed genetic information. But Ms. Fink’s case alleges a more serious offense: her job was terminated because of her genetic risk factors.

A spokesperson for the employer is quoted by the Times as follows: “We are confident that when the facts are revealed, the company’s actions will be seen in a different light and will be seen as being warranted.”

Since we are commenting on a sketchy news report of the bare beginning of what promises to be a complex case, it is important that we refrain from hasty conclusions and await further developments.

Nonetheless, this EEOC complaint, described by an advocacy group as “the first to become public,” raises awareness about GINA and a whole set of new issues for employers relating to the use and misuse of genetic information. We will be keeping a close watch on developments in this emerging area of the law.

Lucky Dogs in Ridgefield

In addition to our busy legal practice, my partner Beverley and I have many outside interests.  Here's a story the town blog recently ran about Bev:

http://www.ridgefieldctblog.com/?s=beverley+rogers

Tags:

Is There Email Privacy in the Workplace?

One of our “hot button” topics is the utilization of a company computer for personal use. While we have cautioned employees not to use their employer’s equipment for private purposes, a recent New Jersey judgment puts another spin on the rule, regarding attorney-client privilege.

In Stengart v. Loving Care Agency, Inc, the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision affirmed that Stengart “could reasonably expect that email communications with her lawyer to her personal account would remain private, and that sending and receiving them via a company laptop did not eliminate the attorney/client privilege that protected them.” The subject matter is of interest in many jurisdictions, not just New Jersey.

 Looking at the details of the case, I found it very interesting that the computer was being used only as a conduit; the employee used it to access a private e-mail account. However, not being sufficiently tech-savvy, she didn’t realize the computer was saving copies in its cache.
This is like an impression being left on the bottom pages of a note pad (movie buff alert: this occurs in Hitchcock’s North by Northwest). There is one difference: you could look down and see the impression on the pad; if you’re not technically savvy, you may not even know there is a cache or even what a cache is.

According to the Employee Rights Blog, the company argued that their policy indicated that emails sent on company equipment could not be considered private or personal. But it also acknowledged that “occasional personal use of email is permitted.” The Court cited other ambiguities, including the fact that there were five versions of the policy floating around.

The Employee Rights Blog has some good suggestions: Employees: don’t use company computers for anything private. Employers: try not to be ambiguous about your company’s computer use policy.